Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elina Avanesyan vs Paula Badosa Gibert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Avanesyan vs Gibert analysis and find out who is favored!
Elina Avanesyan vs Paula Badosa Gibert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Avanesyan 0 - 0 Gibert
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Avanesyan has won 43.76% of points on his second serve, while Gibert has won 46.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Avanesyan, in recent form, has won 54.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gibert has won 55.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.47% and 33.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Avanesyan has saved 50.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibert has saved 66.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Avanesyan has won 51.11% of matches played (W/L 23/ 22), with Gibert winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Avanesyan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 121/ 60), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 28/ 28). Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 165/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Avanesyan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11), where as Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Avanesyan has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.27 while Gibert has played against players with an average rank of 223.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Avanesyan has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibert has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Avanesyan has converted 43.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibert has converted 42.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Avanesyan 0 - 0 Gibert
72
Rank
60
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
126
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
62% (162-100)
Career Total W/L
64% (345-195)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
47% (9-10)
$935,231
Career Prize Money
$4,892,999
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elina Avanesyan | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 47% (9/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (21/23) | 52% (24/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (201/206) | 51% (214/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 71 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 101 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:53 | 1:45:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 144.35 | 241.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (923/1364) | 58% (844/1460) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (539/923) | 66% (560/844) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (193/441) | 46% (284/616) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (80/183) | 43% (68/160) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (628/1384) | 42% (586/1387) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 56% (9/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 44% (9/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 40% (10/4) |
Elina Avanesyan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Elina Avanesyan
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
57 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Cristina Bucsa
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Elina Avanesyan
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Elina Avanesyan
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Elina Avanesyan
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Ons Jabeur
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Erika Andreeva
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Elina Avanesyan
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
94)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Elina Avanesyan
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 6-7(5) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Simona Halep
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Avanesyan Vs Gibert Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Elina Avanesyan
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
